State Ex Rel. Spiros v. Payne
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
The liquor control commission required that applications for permits to sell alcoholic liquors shall contain a certification by the proper municipal authority that such sales are not prohibited by the city ordinances or by-laws at the location for which the permit is sought. See State ex rel. Chatlos v. Rowland,131 Conn. 261, 262, 38 A.2d 785. The plaintiff presented to the defendant, who as city clerk was the official upon whom the duty to certify rested, an application for a restaurant permit for premises on West Main Street in Meriden. General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1939, 959e, provides that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Heimov v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Benson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Nielsen v. Board of Appeals on ZoningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Ullman, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Eramo v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Couch v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Bartram v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.