Legal Opinion
MacAluso v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 11, 1975PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The defendant Thomas M. Devanney takes this appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas sustaining the plaintiff’s appeal from the action of the defendant zoning board of appeals, which had earlier upheld the decision of the building inspector and zoning enforcement official of the town of Windsor that the defendant Devanney’s property could be used as a package store in conformity with the zoning regulations of the town.
The premises which are the subject matter of this appeal have been used since 1933 as a drug store which also sold liquor under a drug store liquor permit. In 1935…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beard's Appeal from County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Beckish v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Salerni v. ScheuySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- O'CONNOR v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Miller v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Karls v. Alexandra Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Helicopter Associates, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Hartford Distributors, Inc. v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Hamill v. NeikindSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.