Legal Opinion

Barnini v. Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 8, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

From a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas sustaining the action of the liquor control commission in denying the application of the plaintiff for a package store permit in Manchester, he has appealed.

The zoning regulations in Manchester prohibit the use of premises for the sale of alcoholic liquor within 1000 feet in a direct line of any other premises so used. Manchester Zoning Regs., art. 4, § 8. The statute makes it mandatory upon the liquor control commission to refuse permits where the sale of alcoholic liquor is prohibited by the zoning ordinance. Rev. 1958, § 30-44.

On January 20,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  2. Hoffman v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Cichy v. KostykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  4. Chouinard v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Aminti v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Steve Viglione Sheet Metal Co. v. SakonchickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Highland Park, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. City of Norwich v. Town of LebanonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Mainolfi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Kallay's Inc. v. KatonaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API