Legal Opinion
Miller v. Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 15, 1949PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The plaintiffs own and operate a restaurant in Bridgeport which possesses a restaurant beer permit issued by the liquor control commission. The premises are located in a business No. 1 zone and are within 1500 feet of fourteen other liquor outlets. The plaintiffs desired to change the liquor use so that they could dispense alcoholic liquor without limitation as to kind under a full or all-alcoholic restaurant permit. General Statutes, Sup. 1945, § 623h (Rev. 1949, § 4244). They prepared an application to the liquor control commission, presented it to the secretary of the defendant zoning…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Piccolo v. Town of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Francis v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Haverback v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Chatlos v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Wise v. TurkingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
3Cited by15 opinions
- Salerni v. ScheuySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Karp v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Kleinsmith v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Gartland v. TalbottIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Fulford v. BD. OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF DOTHAN.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.