Legal Opinion

Laerdal Medical Corp. v. Ambu, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 14, 1995No. Civ. No. K-94-2557PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Laerdal Medical Corporation (hereinafter “Laerdal”) instituted this litigation against defendant Ambu, Inc. (hereinafter “Ambu”) for infringement of Laerdal’s patent covering a cervical extrication collar, willful infringement of that patent, unfair competition and patent mismarking. Defendant Ambu has counterclaimed, asserting unfair competition/trade disparagement by Laerdal. Previously, this Court has denied a number of motions for summary judgment with regard to those claims and counterclaims, concluding that genuine issues of material…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rydeen v. QuiggDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  5. Ridenour v. Andrews Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Network Signatures, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. California Medical Products, Inc. v. Tecnol Medical Products, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995
  3. Haden Schweitzer Corp. v. Arthur B. Myr Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
  4. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. DickinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  5. Allied Tube and Conduit Corp. v. John Maneely Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API