Legal Opinion
Haden Schweitzer Corp. v. Arthur B. Myr Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 20, 1995No. 94-CV-73958-DTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
On September 29, 1994, plaintiffs Haden Schweitzer Corporation (“Haden”), Thermal Engineering Corporation (“TEC”) and Willie H. Best (“Best”) filed a patent infringement action against defendants Arthur B. Myr Industries, Inc. (“Myr”) and Richard P. Marsh-ke (“Marshke”), Myr’s president, for defendants’ installation of a curved wall, radiant oven at Ford Motor Company’s Kansas City facility (“Ford-Kansas City”). Currently before this Court are defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment and plaintiffs’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment1…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gene Autrey Adams v. Paul MetivaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Tom PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- University of Virginia Patent Foundation v. General Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2011
- Jewish Hospital of St. Louis v. Idexx LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1996
- Utecht v. OlsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000