Legal Opinion
CMI, Inc. v. Intoximeters, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided October 28, 1994No. Civ. A. C93-0265-L(H)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action in which CMI seeks a declaration by this Court that it does not infringe Intoximeters’s patent (United States Patent No. 4,495,418) and that the patent is invalid. 1 Plaintiff determined to do so due to the unusual circumstances of controversy between these two leading makers of breathalyzers. As is often true in these cases, the Court is confronted with complicated facts, sometimes uncertain science and the usual thicket of patent legal issues.
On CMI’s motion for partial summary judgment, the Court holds that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Hoganas Ab v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CMI, Inc. v. Intoximeters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1995
- Mas-Hamilton Group v. LaGard, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1997
- Clancy Systems International, Inc. v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1997