Legal Opinion
Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 13, 1990No. 90-1013PublishedCited by 244 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Chief Judge.
Becton Dickinson and Company (BD), appeals the final decision of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Becton Dickinson and Co. v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 719 F.Supp. 1228, 12 USPQ2d 1678 (D.N.J.1989), (Wolin, J.), granting-summary judgment in favor of C.R. Bard, Inc. on a charge of infringement of all claims of BD’s United States Patent No. 3,789,841 (’841). We affirm.
I
The ’841 patent relates to guide wires for use in treating blocked arteries through a technique known as the Seldinger catheteri-zation procedure. In performing the Sel-dinger procedure, a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by244 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.