Clancy Systems International, Inc. v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Clancy Systems International, Inc. (Clancy), asserts claims for damages arising from defendant’s alleged infringement of United States Patents 4,005,388 and 4,007,443. Defendant, Symbol Technologies, Inc. (Symbol) moves for summary judgment on all claims for failure to comply with the marking requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287. For the following reasons, I will grant Symbol’s motion.
I
The following facts are undisputed or, if disputed, are viewed most favorably to Clancy. Clancy owns United States Patents 4,005,388, issued on February…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Team Worldwide Corporation v. Academy, LTD d/b/a Academy Sports + OutdoorsDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2021