Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax Review
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The principal issue in this tax appeal is
the extent of a trial court’s discretion, under General Statutes § 12-117a,1 to award prejudgment interest to an aggrieved taxpayer upon finding that a municipality *751has overassessed the value of the taxpayer’s real property. The plaintiff, Sears, Roebuck and Company, appealed to the trial court from the refusal of the defendant, the board of tax review of the town of West Hartford (board),2 to reduce the assessed value of the plaintiff’s property. The trial court determined that the property in question had been overassessed and, in a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. RutanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Eichman v. J & J Building Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Phillip v. Marsh-MonsantoSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Sosin v. SosinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Narumanchi v. DeStefanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Paulus v. LaSalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Leonard v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.