Legal Opinion
Narumanchi v. DeStefano
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 28, 2005No. AC 25505PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The pro se plaintiff, Radha R. M. Narumanchi, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his tax appeal. In addition to several claims of evidentiary error, the plaintiff alleges a violation of his due process rights. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This appeal involves real property owned by the plaintiff and located at 657 Middletown Avenue in New Haven. The property was valued at $135,900 on the October 1, 2001 grand list. The plaintiff challenged that valuation before the board of assessment appeals (board) 1 of the defendant city of New Haven,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. WargoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Wyszomierski v. SiracusaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Rafalko v. University of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. MourningConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.