Legal Opinion

Eichman v. J & J Building Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 13, 1990No. 14022PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether General Statutes § 49-141 places an affirmative duty on the trial court to determine the fair market value of real property in a deficiency judgment *445proceeding, when the court determines that the parties presented no credible evidence to establish that value. The plaintiff moved for a deficiency judgment following the strict foreclosure of a mortgage that secured a promissory note of the defendants.2 The court denied the motion for a deficiency judgment because it found none of the evidence regarding the value of the mortgaged property to be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Nikitiuk v. PishteySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Sosin v. SosinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  4. Linden Condominium Ass'n v. McKennaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API