Eichman v. J & J Building Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether General Statutes § 49-141 places an affirmative duty on the trial court to determine the fair market value of real property in a deficiency judgment *445proceeding, when the court determines that the parties presented no credible evidence to establish that value. The plaintiff moved for a deficiency judgment following the strict foreclosure of a mortgage that secured a promissory note of the defendants.2 The court denied the motion for a deficiency judgment because it found none of the evidence regarding the value of the mortgaged property to be…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Nikitiuk v. PishteySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Sosin v. SosinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Linden Condominium Ass'n v. McKennaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.