Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. McKevitt
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 1932No. Docket No. 8117PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAUMONT, J., pro tem.
Michael E. I. Mitchell and other members of the San Francisco police department were .examined for the purpose of establishing a list of persons eligible for appointment to the position of captain of police. The examination covered many subjects, and it appears there was a total of four hundred questions asked. A “key” for rating the answers was prepared by examiners appointed by the Civil Service Commission, and after the examination was held all participants therein were invited to inspect it. Those examined then had the privilege of objecting to the answers as given…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Maxwell v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Mann v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People ex rel. Caridi v. CreelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Cook v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Nelson v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Almassy v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Bruce v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.