Legal Opinion
Campbell v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 14, 1941No. Civ. 13174PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoobe, P. J.
This appeal follows judgment after an order sustaining demurrer without leave to amend.
The action arose upon a petition for a writ of mandate. On June 14, 1926, petitioner resigned as concrete foreman of the Bureau of Engineering, city of Los Angeles. April 25, 1935, he filed his request for reinstatement with the Civil Service Commission. April 29,1935, pursuant to said request and the recommendation of the city engineer and the Board of Public Works, petitioner’s name was restored by the commission to the Begister of Eligibles for the position he had formerly occupied. Nine years elapsed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Palmer v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People v. WeitzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hayman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Ferdig v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Morrissey v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.