Mann v. Tracy
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Daniel C. Deasy, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
[1] The order of the Civil Service Commission under review in this case, contained in the notice of examination, stated that the determination as to eligible persons resulting from the proposed examination and the entry thereof in the register of eligible persons should cease to be in force after three years from the date of the determination and adoption of the eligible list. This order was not unreasonable. It is to be assumed that the commission was of the opinion that after the lapse of three years the examination would not be a reliable test of the continued fitness of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Quinchard v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Maxwell v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Pratt v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- People v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- People ex rel. Dean v. Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Walker v. City of San GabrielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Nelson v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Dierssen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.