Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Farmer
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. George L. Farmer, AG No. 41, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Gould, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION The Court indefinitely suspended an attorney who engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, represented clients with a conflict of interest, collected and billed for fees that were unreasonable, and filed a frivolous lawsuit. The attorney’s conduct violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.4 (Communication), 1.5 (Fees), 1.7 (Conflict of Interest—General Rule), 1.16(a)(1) (Declining or Terminating…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Silvia Sanchez-Ballesteros, Personal Representative of the Estate of A.S., et al. v. David Alejandro Cano LopezDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026