Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Farmer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 14, 2023No. 41ag/21PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. George L. Farmer, AG No. 41, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Gould, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION The Court indefinitely suspended an attorney who engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, represented clients with a conflict of interest, collected and billed for fees that were unreasonable, and filed a frivolous lawsuit. The attorney’s conduct violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.4 (Communication), 1.5 (Fees), 1.7 (Conflict of Interest—General Rule), 1.16(a)(1) (Declining or Terminating…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. Silvia Sanchez-Ballesteros, Personal Representative of the Estate of A.S., et al. v. David Alejandro Cano LopezDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API