Legal Opinion

Wilburn v. Reitman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1939No. Civil No. 4096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

— The appellant’s assignments of error are in the following words:

“1. The Court erred in rejecting evidence offered by the plaintiff.
“2. The Court erred in refusing to allow the plaintiff to put on his evidence.
“3. The Court erred in instructing a verdict against the plaintiff.
“4. The Court erred in over-ruling the motion for a new trial. ’ ’

We have so often refused to accept assignments like these as sufficient to present any question for review that we feel we can make no exception in this case. Beebe v. State, 49 Ariz. 190, 65 Pac. (2d) 658; DeMille v. State, 43 Ariz. 551, 33 Pac. (2d)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wootan v. RotenArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Kinney v. NeisArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Demille v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Piper v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. EssrigColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Tidwell v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API