Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Neis

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1912No. Civil No. 1276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. J. C. Phillips, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.

In this case the appellant assigns ás error: (1) The court erred in not rejecting the evidence offered by plaintiff “that plaintiff was, on the twenty-ninth day of July, 1911, the owner of the property mentioned in his bill of sale.” (2) The court erred in adjudging the right of possession of the property in the plaintiff and for his costs. (3) The court erred in dismissing defendant’s cross-complaint. (4) The court erred in not granting a new trial. These assignments of error are very general and indefinite, and it has often been held that such are insufficient to present any question for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liberty Mining & Smelting Co. v. GeddesArizona Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Charouleau v. Shields & PriceArizona Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Sanford v. AinsaArizona Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Romero v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Michener v. Standard Accident InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Floyd v. HornbeckArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Van Dyke v. Cordova Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Barbara Development Corp. v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hamilton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API