Piper v. Taylor
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Mohave. Carl G. Krook, Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS BY THE COURT.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Mohave. Carl G. Krook, Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS BY THE COURT. This action was commenced by F. W. Piper, as the plaintiff, to recover of the defendant the agreed value of goods, wares and merchandise, viz., $96; to recover $225, money loaned at divers times and in divers sums; to recover for meals, hoard, bed and room furnished defendant, of the value of $72; to recover for washing, laundry work and mending furnished defendant, of the value of $10. The plaintiff alleges that each of said items so furnished was furnished the…
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
This record presents questions of practice which, while not decisive of this appeal, are frequently encountered in this court, and for that reason we will here notice before considering the decisive questions.
The matters of taking and perfecting appeals, and of completing and perfecting records of the trial court, are distinct matters, each being regulated by statute specially bearing upon the respective matter involved. The record of an action consists of the following:
Paragraph 602 of the Civil Code of 1913: "Every document and other object filed in a case shall constitute a part of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Newberry v. RuffinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- Roberts v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1898
- Bryan v. PinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. CooperIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Little v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Scott v. ForbesArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Wilburn v. ReitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1939