Legal Opinion

Demille v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1934No. Criminal No. 805PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court upon a verdict finding the defendant guilty of the crime of robbery.

There are some fourteen assignments of error, which read as follows:

“Assignment No. 1. That the Court misdirected the jury as to the law.
“Assignment No. 2. That the Court erred in giving each and every instruction given by the Court of its own motion.
“Assignment No. 3. That the Court erred in giving each and every instruction requested by the prosecution and thereafter given by the Court to the jury.
“Assignment No. 4. That the Court erred in modifying each and every…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. County of Pinal v. HeinerArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Liberty Mining & Smelting Co. v. GeddesArizona Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Wootan v. RotenArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Daggs v. Phœnix National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Daniel v. GallagherArizona Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kinsey v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Beebe v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wilburn v. ReitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. McCormack v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. McCormack v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API