Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Keane
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 19, 1997No. 95 Civ. 1144 (RWS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
In this action brought pursuant to 428 U.S.C. § 1983 and the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, pro se plaintiff Kevin Mitchell (“Mitchell”) has moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., and to amend his complaint, pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. Defendants John P. Keane (“Keane”), Charles Griener (“Griener”), Captain Stark (“Stark”), Lieutenant Dezayas (“Dezayas”), Officer Burgess (“Burgess”), Lieutenant Wohlrab (“Wohlrab”), Physician Assistant Williams (“Williams”), Sergeant Lauricella…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lewis v. WetzelDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Beeson v. Fishkill Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Allen v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Rivera v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Jeanty v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.