Legal Opinion
Beeson v. Fishkill Correctional Facility
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 1998No. 96 Civ. 7677(MBM)PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
William Beeson, plaintiff pro se, sues Fish-kill Correctional Facility (“Fishkill”), Sergeant George Jones, Physician’s Assistant Robert McCombe, and Corrections Officers Steven Wentzel, Thomas O’Brien and D. Griffin, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994), for violating his Eighth Amendment rights. Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
I
Except where otherwise indicated, the following facts are taken from plaintiffs complaint and assumed to be true: At all relevant times,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Douglas Nyhuis v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Eric Holder, Deputy Attorney General Kathleen Hawk, Director-Bop John Hahn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Dwight E. Freeman v. Warden Francis Corrections Officer Shoemaker Nurse KentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Mitchell v. DodrillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Timothy Booth v. Churner, C.O. Workensher, Sgt. Rikus, Lt. W. Gardner, CaptCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Raymond W. Snider v. Dr. MelindezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.