Legal Opinion

Moorman v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1966No. Record 6207PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.

This is an action instituted by Katie Moorman, plaintiff, against Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company [Nationwide] to recover medical expenses incurred by her as a result of an accident, while she was riding as a passenger in an automobile owned by Mozell J. Wynn, and operated by Margaret Louise Wynn, his wife. Plain tiff alleged that at the time of the accident, Nationwide had in effect an automobile insurance policy issued to Mr. Wynn covering the automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger; that it contained an endorsement wherein Nationwide “agreed to pay all medical expenses incurred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  2. Ayres v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  3. Severson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Gunter v. LordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  5. Tart v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ogunde v. Prison Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  2. Harper v. Wausau InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Garcia v. LovelletteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Lord v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  5. Rowe v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API