Legal Opinion
Gunter v. Lord
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 26, 1962No. 45858PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOURNET, Chief Justice.
A writ of certiorari was granted in this case but the review was “limited to the issue of plaintiff Gunter’s .right to recover twice for medical expenses,” on the showing made by applicant for the writ that a conflict exists between decisions of the Courts of Appeal of the State and that the question has not yet been decided by this Court.
The instant action, ex delicto, is for damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. David Gunter and Mrs. Hazel Lord, were injured through the negligent operation of the car hy its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Severson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Long-Bell Petroleum Co. v. TriticoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Dumas v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- Distefano v. Delta Fire & Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Breaux v. SimonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Bozeman v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Yarrington v. ThornburgSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Hall v. State, Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Tuggle v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Fontana v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.