Legal Opinion

Lord v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided October 15, 1982No. Record 800158PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCompton, J.

In this automobile insurance case, the sole question we decide is whether the trial court correctly ruled the insured failed to give the insurer notice of claim “as soon as practicable.”

In three recent cases, construing notice provisions in the context of liability coverages, we held that performance of such provisions is a condition precedent to coverage under the insurance contract, “requiring substantial compliance by the insured.” State Farm v. Porter, 221 Va. 592, 599, 272 S.E.2d 196, 200 (1980). Accord, Liberty Mutual v. Safeco, 223 Va. 317, 288 S.E.2d 469 (1982); Erie Insurance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  4. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. BristowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  5. Erie Insurance Exchange v. MeeksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Peavey Co. v. M/V ANPACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Craig v. DyeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  4. Penn-America Insurance v. MappDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API