Legal Opinion

Couser v. Couser

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1954No. Civ. 20106PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

Plaintiff and defendant lived together as husband and wife for nearly seven years. They had no children. The husband was granted an uncontested interlocutory decree of divorce from the wife March 18, 1953. The two parties had entered into a property settlement agreement, which was approved by the interlocutory decree. The wife had also quitclaimed the family home to the husband.

June 11, 1953, the wife filed notice of motion under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to vacate the interlocutory decree, and to set aside the property agreement and the quitclaim deed. The wife also ■ asked…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Hughes v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Trujillo v. TrujilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Gillingham v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Troxell v. TroxellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Kapple v. KappleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Osborn v. OsbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Kesselman v. KesselmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API