Legal Opinion
Troxell v. Troxell
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 23, 1965No. Civ. 22175PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.
On this appeal by defendant and cross-complainant from the trial court's order denying her motion to set aside the interlocutory judgment of divorce which had been entered in her favor 1 the sole issue presented to this court is whether or not the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside this judgment. 2 We have concluded that there was no abuse of discretion.
This action was initiated by the filing of a complaint for divorce by plaintiff husband on January 10, 1963. Defendant wife answered and cross-complained for separate maintenance on February 6, 1963. The matter came on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Brackett v. BanegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Cope v. CopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Redsted v. WeissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Warburton v. KieferleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Marriage of CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Duncan v. Sunset Agricultural MineralsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Wallis v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.