Legal Opinion

Kapple v. Kapple

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1956No. Civ. 21331PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying a motion to vacate his default and the interlocutory decree of divorce entered thereon in favor of the plaintiff wife. Appellant complains principally of the award of the real property to the wife. The affidavits upon the motion are in conflict and appellant’s counsel devotes himself to an argument as to the effect of that evidence.

It is of course presumed that the trial court resolved any conflicts in favor of the prevailing party (Warren v. Warren, 120 Cal.App.2d 396, 400 [261 P.2d 309]; Baratti v. Baratti, 109 Cal.App.2d 917, 922 [242 P.2d 22]), and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Baratti v. BarattiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Warren v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Couser v. CouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Price v. HibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Rackov v. RackovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Goodson v. the Bogerts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Counterman v. CountermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API