Legal Opinion
Automotive Management Group, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 2, 1993No. H009979PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Automotive Management Group, Inc. (AMG) protested its termination as a franchised dealer of respondent/real party in interest Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc. (MMSA). AMG’S protest was rejected because it was untimely. AMG petitioned for a writ of mandate. The trial court found that substantial evidence supported the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) determination that AMG’s protest was untimely. It therefore denied AMG’s mandate petition. We reverse and remand the matter for a hearing before respondent the New Motor Vehicle Board (Board).
Facts and Procedural Background
In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Karlin v. ZaltaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Unnamed Physician v. Board of Trustees of Saint Agnes Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Economic Empowerment Foundation v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Guarantee Forklift, Inc. v. Capacity of Texas, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Kawasaki Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.