Oliver MacHinery Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J .
On cross-motions for summary judgment or adjudication of issues, the trial court determined as a matter of law United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G) has no duty to defend or indemnify Oliver Machinery Company (Oliver) in the underlying action under a vendor’s broad form endorsement contained in a policy issued to Pal Industries, Inc. (Pal).
There are two issues on appeal. First, does an exclusionary clause for relabeled products release the insurer from providing coverage and the duty to defend the additional insured. Second, is a product manufactured by a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Miller v. Elite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Herzog v. National American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Ponder v. Blue Cross of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Weaver v. CCA Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Cooper Companies, Inc. v. Transcontinental InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Quemetco Inc. v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.