Legal Opinion
Quemetco Inc. v. Pacific Automobile Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1994No. B071013PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (Fred), J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant insurance companies, ruling that they did not have to provide insurance coverage to plaintiff in two underlying lawsuits. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Synopsis
I. Factual History1
Except for Continental Insurance Company, which is alleged to be a successor in interest to New Zealand Insurance Company and Phoenix Assurance Company of New York, respondents are insurance companies which issued several general liability insurance policies to Western Lead Products Company (Western Lead), a California…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Stratton v. First National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Northern Insurance Company of New York, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Unigard Insurance v. LevenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Fluor Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Gen. Accident Ins. Co. of Am. v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.