Legal Opinion

Klarquist v. Chamberlain & Proctor

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1932No. Docket No. 7169PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The plaintiff and appellant Blanche Klarquist, individually and as guardian ad litem of certain minors instituted an action for damages alleged to have arisen from the wrongful death of one Edward N. Klarquist upon a public thoroughfare. The defendant and appellant, hereinafter designated as the contractor, was joined with the defendant and respondent, admittedly the owner of certain abutting real property upon which said contractor constructed a building and sidewalk, and the defendant who was driving an automobile which collided with the deceased. From a judgment entered upon the verdict of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Feeney v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Lambel v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Setter's Admr. v. City of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gibson v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Lacy v. Pacific Gas Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Jones v. City of South San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Pope v. Cruise Boat Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Girard v. Monrovia City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API