Legal Opinion

Lambel v. City of Florence

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1924No. 24,878PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff was injured in a collision of two automobiles at a street intersection in Florence, and sued the city for damages on the ground that an obstruction to the view which the city had negligently permitted near by had caused the accident.

The city’s demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition was sustained, and the only question for review is whether a cause of action was stated.

Plaintiff’s original petition had joined the driver and the owner of the other automobile as defendants with the city and the hotel company, and had charged the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ParrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Home Oil & Gas Co. v. DabneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Eberhardt v. Glasgow Mutual Telephone Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Goodaile v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Barton v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Smith v. Mead Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Harvey v. GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Crawford v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API