Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 17, 1942No. Appeals, 302 and 311PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The facts in these appeals are interrelated. The claims for unemployment compensation were consolidated for hearing before the hoard and they will be similarly treated here.
Phillips was employed at the Hazleton Shaft Mine which wa's operated by the Lehigh Valley Coal Company with Hazleton Shaft Colliery as a unit. This operation also included Hazleton No. 1 Mine as an auxiliary from which coal was transported by rail to the breaker at the shaft mine. The appeal of Phillips, by agreement, will dispose of the claims of 1,275 employees of the Lehigh Company. Appellant Howley,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Hoffman v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Cage v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. CejaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Lee v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Sinclair v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.