Legal Opinion

Garson v. Steamboat Canal Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1919No. 2391PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Thomas F. Moran, Judge. Action by Paul Garson and others against the Steamboat Canal Company and others. From a judgment granting a temporary injunction, the named defendant appeals. Damages that plaintiffs may sustain by the enforcement of the rate in question are such that they can be easily ascertained by a court and jury. The order granting an injunction pendente lite should be reversed and set aside.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Thomas F. Moran, Judge. Action by Paul Garson and others against the Steamboat Canal Company and others. From a judgment granting a temporary injunction, the named defendant appeals. Damages that plaintiffs may sustain by the enforcement of the rate in question are such that they can be easily ascertained by a court and jury. The order granting an injunction pendente lite should be reversed and set aside. The lower court had no authority to grant an injunction pendente lite against the enforcement of a rate fixed by the public utility…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

The appellant corporation, the Steamboat Canal Company, is a public utility engaged in the business of delivering water from the Truckee River, through its canal, known as the Steamboat Canal, to a number of users for agricultural and other purposes. In a former year the public service commission of Nevada had established the rate for the delivery and sale of water to such users at $6.50 per miner’s inch per annum, and when paid in *303advance on or before June 1 of .each year at $6 per miner’s inch. On or before May 18, 1918, the Steamboat Canal Company filed with the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Stettler v. O'HaraOregon Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  2. City of North Las Vegas v. Public Service CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hoffman v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Nevada Power Co. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. RothrockNevada Supreme Court · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API