Legal Opinion

Sohio Petroleum Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1968No. 45,029PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.;

This is an action to recover ad valorem taxes for die year 1965 paid under protest. The plaintiffs allege the taxes they seek to recover are the result of discriminatory, arbitrary, unjust and inequitable assessment of their oil and gas properties owned in Russell County, Kansas.

The trial court without hearing the merits of the case dismissed the action and granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the ground that the written statement in which the plaintiffs protested these taxes failed to conform to the requirements of K.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Washington Township v. HartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. DaltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Moses v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Henderson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ekan Properties v. WilhmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. In Re the Real Estate Tax Protest of RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Sohio Petroleum Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. In Re the Real Estate Tax Protest of RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. In Re the Real Estate Tax Protest of RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API