Legal Opinion

Ekan Properties v. Wilhm

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 30, 1997No. 77,117PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

The question in this case is: As between Ekan Properties and John Wilhm, who is entitled to a partial refund of ad valorem taxes paid for the tax years 1989, 1990, and 1991?

Highly summarized, the facts are as follows: Wilhm was a general partner in a partnership which owned real estate in Shawnee County subject to a mortgage. The Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) ultimately became conservator for the mortgage holder.

The partnership paid, with the appropriate protests pursuant to K.S.A. 79-2005, part of the ad valorem taxes on the property…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Memorial Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. Mitzner Ex Rel. Bishop v. State, Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. Galindo v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Pope v. RansdellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Palmer v. First Nat'l Bank of KingmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McGinley v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. Goldbarth v. Kansas State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Charles B. Wilson, Jr., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. Regency Park, LP v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. Limestone Farms, Inc. v. Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API