Ekan Properties v. Wilhm
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Abbott, J.:
The question in this case is: As between Ekan Properties and John Wilhm, who is entitled to a partial refund of ad valorem taxes paid for the tax years 1989, 1990, and 1991?
Highly summarized, the facts are as follows: Wilhm was a general partner in a partnership which owned real estate in Shawnee County subject to a mortgage. The Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) ultimately became conservator for the mortgage holder.
The partnership paid, with the appropriate protests pursuant to K.S.A. 79-2005, part of the ad valorem taxes on the property…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Memorial Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Mitzner Ex Rel. Bishop v. State, Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Galindo v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Pope v. RansdellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Palmer v. First Nat'l Bank of KingmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGinley v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- Goldbarth v. Kansas State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Amoco Production Co. v. Charles B. Wilson, Jr., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Regency Park, LP v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Limestone Farms, Inc. v. Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.