Legal Opinion

Washington Township v. Hart

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 28, 1950No. 37,807PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Arn, J.:

This is an appeal by Washington township of Nemaha county from an order sustaining a demurrer to the petition and from an order sustaining a motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus in a mandamus proceeding instituted by the township to require the county treasurer to distribute and pay to the township certain taxes which the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company had paid under protest. In addition to the county treas urer of Nemaha county, the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company and the three members of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of HumboldtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. State ex rel. Ward v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kopp v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Palmer v. First Nat'l Bank of KingmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  3. Board of Adjustment v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Sohio Petroleum Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Oklahoma Real Estate Commission v. National Business and Property Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API