Legal Opinion

In Re the Real Estate Tax Protest of Rice

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 20, 1980No. 50,627PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

This is an appeal in a tax protest matter in which we are called upon to determine two issues: whether House Bill No. 3228, enacted by the 1980 Kansas Legislature and now appearing as Chapter 236, Laws of 1980, is constitutional; and whether delinquent taxes may be subject to protest under the provisions of K.S.A. 79-2005.

The first issue was resolved in Board of Greenwood County Comm’rs v. Nadel, 228 Kan. 469, 618 P.2d 778 (1980), where we held that Chapter 236, Laws of 1980, is constitutional. We adhere to that determination.

We now turn to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of Greenwood County Comm'rs v. NadelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Sohio Petroleum Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wirt v. EsreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. J. Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Harvey County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Board of Osage County Comm'rs v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  4. Crow v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  5. In re the Tax Protests & Grievances of Curtis Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API