Legal Opinion

Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Zimmer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1935No. 32,113PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment denying an injunction forbidding the county treasurer of Wyandotte county to return to three taxpayers certain payments of tax moneys made by them under formal protest, which protests were sustained by the state tax commission.

It appears that in August, 1932, the plaintiff drainage district prepared and published its budget for the fiscal year, July 1, 1932, to June 30, 1933. In it the drainage board made an estimate that the expenses which would probably have to be met from its general fund would be $22,495…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hicks v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. City of Emporia v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. Bailey v. City of Baldwin CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Hodgins v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Felten Truck Line, Inc. v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Wirt v. EsreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Parker v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. Harris v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Eureka Building & Loan Ass'n v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API