Legal Opinion

Hocking v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1951No. L. A. 21917PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff, in reliance on a policy of title insurance, seeks to recover from defendant title insurance companies for damages she claims to have sustained by reason of what is asserted to be a defect in the title to certain land purchased by her in the city of Palm Springs, county of Riverside. Judgment on the pleadings was rendered in defendants’ favor, and plaintiff appeals. The issue presented is whether plaintiff’s complaint states a cause of action (see Union Flower Market, Ltd. v. Southern California Flower Market, Inc. (1938), 10 Cal.2d 671, 673 [76 P.2d 503]; Seeger v. Odel (1941), 18…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Somerset Savings Bank v. Chicago Title InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. Hulse v. First American Title Co. of Crook CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Manneck v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Dollinger Deanza Associates v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API