Dollinger Deanza Associates v. Chicago Title Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal arises from a dispute concerning title insurance coverage. In 2004, appellant Dollinger DeAnza Associates (Dollinger) purchased real property in Cupertino that it believed was divided into seven parcels, with the intention of selling parcel 7. In conjunction with the purchase, Dollinger obtained a title insurance policy from respondent Chicago Title Insurance Company (Chicago Title). Dollinger later entered into an agreement to sell parcel 7, but the sale was not completed because the purchaser, Pacific Peninsula Group,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Biller v. Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Silva v. See's Candy Shops, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Cal. Bank & Trust v. Lawlor CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Westport Insurance v. Northern California ReliefDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Burgueno v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.