Legal Opinion

Manneck v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1994No. B076833PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment finding in favor of defendant in an action for declaratory relief, following a nonjury trial. The trial court found, inter alia, that defendant Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation 1 had no obligation to prosecute an action on behalf of plaintiffs Paul A. Manneck and Jennifer H. Manneck-Regina or to indemnify them for any losses since the alleged defects in plaintiffs’ title are not within the coverage of the title insurance policy issued by defendant. As an obvious consequence of the declaratory relief finding, the judgment also entailed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Paramount Properties Co. v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. City of Hollister v. Monterey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Quan v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. R & B Auto Center, Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Michaelian v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API