Legal Opinion
Hampton v. Hamilton Const. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 30, 1935No. 25303PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Peremptory writ of mandamus was awarded by the judgment from which this appeal comes. The county treasurer of Washington county was thereby commanded to pay from the sinking fund of the county, a final jurgment, in the sum of $842.27, with interest and costs, previously rendered in' the same court, in a cause wherein the Hamilton Construction Company was plaintiff and the board of county commissioners of Washington county was defendant.
It is agreed in the briefs that there exists, and the record presented shows, an unencumbered cash balance in the sinking fund of the county in an amount…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hatfield v. MorelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- City of Shawnee v. City of TecumsehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Olson v. SchulzWashington Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by10 opinions
- Board of County Commisioners v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. CasadyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Foster v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Winrock Farms v. EldredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- State Ex Rel. City of Shawnee v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.