Legal Opinion

Olson v. Schulz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1916No. 12962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered January 5, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action brought by the respondent, Olson, against the appellant, Schulz, and the de*476fendant Eggers, to recover a balance claimed to be due upon a promissory note, and against the defendants Lund to recover for the same liability because of the wrongful act of R. H. Lund in releasing a mortgage given as security for the note. Judgment went against Schulz and the Lunds; Eggers being released because of his prior discharge in bankruptcy. Schulz appeals.

In November, 1907, Eggers was indebted to Olson in the sum of $3,161, and to Schulz in the sum of about $2,000. Eggers, at that time,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hampton v. Hamilton Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API