Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Shawnee v. Williamson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1939No. 29364PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an original action for :a writ of mandamus, filed by the relator, city of Shawnee, against respondent, Williamson, as Attorney General and ex-officio Bond Commissioner, to require the approval of a bond issue. Respondent refused to approve the bonds on two grounds: First, that the proposed issue would make relator’s debt exceed the limits contained in section 26, art. 10, of the Oklahoma Constitution; and, second, that the proposed issue is not for a legally authorized purpose. The parties have, at the suggestion of the court, filed a stipulation as to the financial condition of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Coleman v. FrameSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. In Re Tax Levies of City of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Severns Paving Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Shawnee v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. City of Tulsa v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Beazley v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Pauls Valley v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. State ex rel. City of Ada v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API