People v. Woods
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
The People appeal from a judgment granting defendant’s Penal Code section 995 motion to dismiss the first count of the information, which charged him with a burglary of a vehicle (Pen. Code, § 459). The only question on appeal is whether the court below properly concluded that the People had failed to prove an essential element of the offense as defendant entered a vehicle whose doors were locked by reaching into a window that had been left open deliberately. For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that the judgment must be affirmed.
The pertinent facts as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Young K.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. Lamont R.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003