Legal Opinion
Bell Lumber and Pole Co. v. US Fire Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1994No. Civ. 4-89-931PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the joint motion of defendants Continental Casualty Company (“CCC”) and Centennial Insurance Company (“Centennial”) for summary judgment. Bell Lumber and Pole Company (“Bell Lumber”) has incurred certain costs related to pollution damage. Bell Lumber brought suit seeking to hold various insurers responsible for those and future related costs. CCC and Centennial contend that their liability insurance policies do not cover Bell Lumber’s pollution-related claims. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sylvester Bros. Development Co. v. Great Central Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. WasmuthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. Vacuum Tanks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Bell Lumber & Pole Co. v. United States Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Employers InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
- Bell Lumber & Pole Co. v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Perez v. ZL Restaurant Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.