Legal Opinion

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Wasmuth

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 1988No. C1-88-1014PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Grinnell Mutual brought a declaratory judgment seeking a determination that the “pollution” exclusion in liability insurance policies issued to Edwin Carlson’s business precluded coverage for alleged damage to a home and its occupants caused by formaldehyde unexpectedly emitted from deteriorating foam insulation Carlson sold and installed.

The trial court denied Grinnell’s summary judgment motion and granted summary judgment for respondent homeowners. Claims against Carlson’s business were dismissed because its exposure to liability had been extinguished by a settlement…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Just v. Land Reclamation Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. West American Insurance Co. v. Tufco Flooring East, IncCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API