Legal Opinion

Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Employers Insurance

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided January 24, 2007No. 03-1201PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MIHM, District Judge.

Now before the Court are three Motions for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant Employers Insurance, Company of Wausau’s (“Wausau”) Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of “no suit” [# 72] is DENIED; Wau-sau’s Motion on the issue of late notice [# 38] is DENIED; Wausau’s Motion on the pollution exclusion [# 70] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

BACKGROUND

A full statement of this case, including a history of the relationship between the parties, has already been set out in the District Court’s Order of August 1, 2005, [# 35] and the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weitz Co., LLC v. Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Landmark American Insurance Company v. Deerfield Construction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Weitz Company v. Lloyds LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API